Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Education (STEM) and Career and Technical Education (CTE) Research
A good place to start in any analysis of STEM issues is with the future demand for workers with STEM skills. We’ve seen two excellent reports on this issue -- one from the Congressional Research Service, and the other from Georgetown University. There is also this report, which details the longer time it takes for employers to fill STEM related job openings in different cities around the United States. Here is a 2015 overview of the shortage of STEM workers in manufacturing in the U.S, here is one about the intersection of science with 21st century skills, and here is an extensive report from Pew on the future of work.
To balance these reports, you should also read this contrary view, which claims the STEM worker shortage is a myth (it also has a great list of references).
In Colorado, an August 2014 report termed STEM "vital to the state's economic future" and proposed a roadmap for improving outcomes. The story on this initiative is here, and the roadmap is here.
One of the fundamental issues with STEM is the struggle to define just what it means. The "S" and "M" parts are the easiest to grasp, as they correspond to our current science and math curricula, which provide the foundation for the "E" and "T". Engineering is also quite easy to describe, as it entails the application of math and science principles to solve practical problems. So far, so good. But what is "Technology" all about? Too often we find it confused with "Information Technology", which leads to recommendations for courses in coding, data science, and modeling, for example. While well-intentioned, we believe these suggestions are far too narrow, and what is needed is a broader understanding of what technology is, how it evolves, and the central role it plays in our economy (and thus, indirectly, in our politics as well). The best book we’ve seen that examines these issues is Brian Arthur's The Nature of Technology. Here is a link to the Amazon page for this book.
There has been no shortage of reports in recent years about issues in STEM education. Here are some of the best ones we’ve read:
- STEM Education Primer by the Congressional Research Service
- Engineering in K12 Education, by the National Science Foundation
- Successful K12 STEM Education by the National Research Council, and this subsequent update
- STEM Integration in K12 Education by the National Research Council (just published in March 2014)
- STEM Policy Report by the ACT Organization
- STEM Attrition Report, by the National Center on Educational Statistics, which provides a lot of data and insight about why college students drop out of STEM programs.
At the implementation level, there are also a number of excellent reports available, including:
- Characteristics of Successful STEM Education
- Best Practices in K12 STEM Education
- Massachusetts STEM Curriculum Framework
- Massachusetts Guide to Evaluating STEM Programs
- Massachusetts Guide to Increasing Student Interest in STEM
- Massachusetts has recently released updates to its STEM curriculum. they include( (1) Science and Engineering Practices Progression from K to 12; (2) Draft Revised Science, Engineering, and Math Standards; (3) Disciplinary Core Progression for various science topics from PreK to Grade 10; and (4) Characteristics of an Effective Standards Based Science Classroom.
- Boulder Valley School District's recent (and thorough) analysis of the many different math curriculum packages that are available.
- Just saw this rather discouraging story in the WSJ about the decline of HS students' interest in STEM careers
For parents trying to decide whether to send their children to the district's new STEM schools, The Jefferson Association for Gifted Children has produced this guide
Career and Technical Education, or CTE, has a significant overlap with STEM. For example, here is a very encouraging report from California about the high returns from better Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs. And here is another excellent report from the Center for Public Education on the benefits of improving CTE. Finally, here is an excellent report about how the development of clear career pathways for students, improved CTE offerings, competency based education, and the definition of recognition of certified competencies can interact to produce non-linear improvements in outcomes for students.
Here is an excellent new overview from Gallup about the state of high school computer science education in the United States — it provides good benchmarking information for your school or district.